prosecutor tells court docket canberra legal professional ben aulich hoped to reap thousands and thousands from alleged cash laundering plan

prosecutors have advised the act magistrates court docket that canberra lawyer ben aulich and accountant michael papandrea hoped to reap more than $1 million a 12 months from an alleged cash-laundering plan.

each had been charged with conspiracy to launder money. mr aulich faces an alternative price of recruiting others to have interaction in crook hobby.

on friday, they misplaced a bid to have the charges heard within the magistrates court docket, after prosecutor mark tedeschi advised the courtroom it didn’t have jurisdiction to listen the case, and the prices need to be sent to the act ideal court for trial.

“it would be tough to imagine a greater extreme case … than an officer of the court docket attractive with a customer to installation a gadget to interact in laundering money,” mr tedeschi stated.

he informed the court docket the most penalties inside the magistrates court have been insufficient for the crime and it become abundantly clear there had been severe prison issues that needed to be considered via the ideally suited courtroom.

transcripts screen conversation approximately cash laundering
mr tedeschi found out new info of ways mr aulich and mr papandrea had allegedly hatched a plan with an undercover police officer to shop for a grocery store to launder money obtained thru the sale of illegal cigarettes.

the undercover officer have been carrying a cord, and police had listened in on conversations with mr aulich.

a few transcripts were read to the court docket on friday.

at one point, the officer informed mr aulich “human beings nevertheless gotta smoke”, suggesting the marketplace was higher than capsules or alcohol.

the officer stated the returns could be about $one hundred,000 a month, or as much as $1.2 million a 12 months.

“it’s well worth it … it’s no longer chump exchange,” one in all them said.

the transcript also noted mr aulich mentioned how so much coins could not go to the financial institution.

“you have a cloth cabinet complete of f***ing cash — what are you going to do with it?” mr aulich allegedly stated.

mr tedeschi advised the court the verbal exchange sponsored up the prosecution’s case.

“that’s a communique between them approximately how they’re going to launder their cash,” mr tedeschi said.

“the discussion is ready shopping a commercial enterprise for the specific and sole motive of laundering $1.2 million in step with year.”

he stated the quantities discussed were a long way above the $30,000 limit at the magistrates courtroom’s jurisdiction.

however mr aulich’s lawyer steven whybrow advised the court docket the allegation become most effective about a conspiracy, and no amount of money changed fingers.

he talked about it changed into the “agent provocateur” — the undercover officer — who noted the quantities.

“right here it’s miles a future, hypothetical announcement,” mr whybrow said.

concerns had been also raised about how long the case become taking, and that if the magistrates court wouldn’t hear it, the trial won’t be held till three years after the authentic costs have been laid.

but magistrate michael crompton informed the court the costs had been too critical and the amount too high, ruling the lower courtroom did not have jurisdiction.

legal professionals for mr aulich and mr papandrea informed the court docket they have been now not carried out yet with the magistrates court docket, and deliberate to contest any committal proceedings earlier than a excellent court docket trial.

the case will go back to court in november.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.