clarkstown manager hoehmann says city legal professional studying viable ways to overturn time period limits regulation

former elected officials remind hoehmann, councilman borelli, that they supported time period limits in 2015 in letter to board

it became a piece like that moment in casablanca whilst claude rains as captain renault blows his police whistle and says rick’s cafe have to be closed, and then wryly adds, ”i’m greatly surprised, taken aback to discover that gambling is going on here!”

it is an open secret that town of clarkstown board participants are in energetic discussions approximately getting rid of the city’s time period limits but many still feigned surprise on tuesday whilst the issue was raised at a metropolis board assembly. ultimately the city manager conceded he’s asked the town attorney to check the law enacted six years in the past that restriction board participants to a total of 8 consecutive years. both metropolis supervisor george hoehmann and councilman frank borelli are rounding out their final phrases below the modern law.

“i wasn’t organized to speak approximately this, it wasn’t on tonight’s agenda,” said councilman pat carroll, adding that “that is a sticky situation. it puts people who voted for term limits in a clumsy role. if it does arise, they’ll ought to justify why they changed their opinion.” carroll was referring to george hoehmann and frank borelli, who were then the republican minority on a democratic-led metropolis board and who voted for the imposition of time period limits.

the problem became sparked by using new town resident pam hudson who study a letter in the course of the general public comment duration on behalf of three former democrat board participants who expressed dismay over the town council probably seeking to eliminate term limits, forcing the contemporary city board to deal with the issue in public for the primary time.

“it has come to all and sundry’s attention which you are contemplating overturning the time period limits law that was exceeded in 2015 by using the town board,” said hudson, adding that the letter stated, “we all understand that could suggest that this is the ultimate time period of carrier for both councilman borelli and supervisor hoehmann.”

borelli, in a heated reaction, indicated he become now not in prefer of getting rid of term limits. not anything within the present regulation could avert borelli from going for walks for city supervisor because it especially lets in an elected officer to are seeking for a “distinctive non-compulsory public workplace.”

“it’s not on our agenda tonight however any dialogue about overturning the regulation, i definitely disagree,” said borelli. “i’m strongly towards overturning it.”

the letter referred to that the metropolis board unanimously voted for term limits in 2015, which constrained board participants to serve for a total of 8 consecutive years. the law became followed in 2014 and took effect in 2015.

the letter reminded borelli that at the time the vote changed into being contemplated in 2015, the councilman had said “the concept had merit and cautioned that the metropolis board have a look at different options to enact the law.”

the town board enacted the law at the equal time it modified over to the ward system, which divided the city into 4 separate blocs with person representation.

the politically-tinged letter, efficiently penned with the aid of the clarkstown democratic committee, but signed off on with the aid of former metropolis supervisor alex gromack, and councilwomen shirley lasker and stephanie hausner, took issue with the ability reversal of the law being contemplated by using the republican-dominated town board.

“all of us voted for time period limits in 2015 and assumed that any elected reliable, especially ones who voted for the regulation and have been strong proponents of it, could abide with the aid of the regulation despite the fact that it meant they limited their very own phrases of workplace,” the letter said. hudson passed each board member a copy of the letter.

overturning the regulation might require 4 of the five board members to vote in favor of lifting the limits.

at least one councilman favoring an quit to term limits is don franchino however he stopped quick, saying it’s no longer some thing town board members should vote on. rather, he advised the town “hold a referendum on the difficulty.”

“the human beings of clarkstown have a proper to determine,” he stated.

rumors that the town might keep a unique assembly on the issue inside the very last week of august while many humans are away have been quashed when manager george hoehmann stated, “nothing has been scheduled.”

the letter additionally raises the question over whether the council is attempting to find a method to “annul it or have their city attorney claim that the law become in no way legitimate within the first region.”

carroll weighed in in this: “the language is clear to have term limits of eight years. the law isn’t always indistinct.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.